Msc1G4:Page6
TUD 4
Bewar Ahmed - Nino Schoonen
Introduction In response to our collaboration with Arwin and the study of what the influence is of cell structures towards characteristics of the TPE surface we have set up this report. For our MSc 1 studio Non-standard and Interactive Architecture (by Hyperbody) we are currently designing a furniture for joggers. For this furniture we came up with a set of different fitness-activities which all have their own requirements regarding the material and the softness of this material. In order to choose an adequate structure for the TPE for our furniture we’ve done some research. In this report we will firstly discuss the research method we have handled. Secondly we will state all our research results. After that we will end our report with a conclusion, a reflection and a discussion for a potential follow-up study.
The research method
For our research we handled the method of research through design. This means that we designed three
different patterns in Grasshopper. Each pattern with a different cell structure with the aim of manipulating
the softness of the material. After finishing the designs, we printed the patterns with a 3D printer. This in
order to examine the deformation, soft-, and hardness of the patterns after imposing a force on it.
The Research
Requirements As said before the designed furniture requires different materialization assets in order has different requirements conform materialization. There are parts that need to be soft, parts that need to be hard, parts that can be hollow etc. We started our research with mapping out the different requirements. The figure on the right shows the different requirements.
Fragment
We have chosen to focus on the area where people can do sit-up workouts, as this part of the furniture contains an interesting balance between structural requirements and softness for the end-user. After all, we don't want visitors to hurt themselves performing their workout; it is here where the right surface softness is required. A surface soft enough so it will feel comfortable, but also hard enough to perform the workout correctly.
Our objective is to solve the requirements for piece of furniture first and prove them to work, as these systematics can be applied to the other parts of the model later on.
Focusing on a small fragment was also necessary considering the time and manpower we had.
Patterns
For the chosen fragment we designed 3 different patterns, each with different cell structure. For inspiration
we looked at the nature, research that had already been done and haphazardly designing figures in the
hope to invent something useful. After some days searching for the right patterns we came up with three
totally different structures as shown below.
3D printing
Our next step, after designing the three patterns, was to print out what we had designed. As printing
with TPE is something not usual, printing with TPE was a research on itself. Luckily we could get some help from Serdar Asut from the Building tech print lab.
Results
The three videos below show the
TPE 45D Experiment: Semi-Flexible TPE, Wireframe structure
TPE 85A Experiment: Flexible TPE, Spongeous structure
Conclusion The TPE experiments can be printed after the holidays at the Building Tech print lab so our conclusions follow…
Discussion
In the presentation of Foteini Setaki given on Tuesday the 31st of October we got inspired by the idea
of using recycled plastic for our furniture. For this reason, we did some research into using recycled plastic
as a filament for our 3D prints. The conclusion of our research was, in short:
Recycling plastic is an intensive process that takes a lot of time and energy. The process includes
collecting, washing, shredding, adding chemicals a reforming the plastic. Beside the insensitivity and the
time taking process recycled plastic hasn’t the same characteristics as TPE. The most important
characteristic is the flexibility of the material. Shortly that is the reason why there is not chosen for recycled plastic as main material.
At the start of this course we’ve analyzed the activity on the site during different times of the day. Knowing
who is around the area helped us define what target group we should design for: a furniture for runners.
After this exercise we started to remap the experience of going for a run (as explained in the lecture of
Milica Pavlovic). We observed that Kralingen is an amazing area for runners, but giving runners the
option to do a run combined with sport-exercises on a parametric furniture would be an interesting
addition for runners. User remapping helped us define this concept.
Continuing this approach, we’ve came up with a set of passive workouts. We zoomed into these activities
by looking at the movements happening doing these activities and the relation to the surface and the
human body. We translated these activities into sections, which we used to make a complete form using
clay models.
H. Bier and S. Mostafavi
Structural Optimization for Materially Informed Design to Robotic Production Processes
The additive production approach
Mapping stress lines using Karamba gave us insights in the structural forces and tensions happening in
our macro geometry. This exercise enabled us to generate a point cloud inside our geometry, based on
structural loads. By optimizing point cloud densities based on generated stress lines we are dealing with
the so-called demand driven architecture. Of course, load bearing aspects is just one of the demands
we need to deal with in our sub-divided components, but rain, usability patterns, assembly methods
etcetera are also demands that could be added in later stages. We focused on the efficiency of material
usage and load bearing demands because we felt like this was a logical bottom-up approach, adding
further demands later onwards.
Also, a lot of our research is based on experimenting with the characteristics a semi-flexible 3D-printable TPE material. Designing a variety of 3d-patterns and printing these at the Building Technology print-lab, we are integrating digital production processes with material characteristics. Doing such experiments is of a great value because now we can judge the materials bending behavior and learn from the production process, manipulating the patterns from these conclusions and we even combine these structures with each other in order to generate an even more efficient structure. (Bier & Mostafavi, 2015) Optimizing structural load bearing The objective of our research Our aim was to find the right porosity in TPE, forming a smooth and soft surface.
